IPOB is not happy with one Sylvester Ude,
also known as Debe Ojukwu, who is said to
be the eldest son of late Chief Chukwuemeka
Odumegwu-Ojukwu
– Debe Ojukwu said Nnamdi Kanu was not
the leader of IPOB and he did not take the
advice of the elders so they cannot help
secure his release from prison
– Reacting to Debe’s statement, IPOB said
he was an impostor with a disorganized brain
The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has a
reacted to a statement credited to Chief
Sylvester Debe Ojukwu, who is said to be the
eldest son of late Chief Chukwuemeka
Odumegwu-Ojukwu, on Biafra struggle,
Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB leadership.
IPOB said Debe Ojukwu was an impostor
He added that Kanu was not the leader of
IPOB, but one Chief Justice Eze Ozobu, a
former chief judge of Enugu state and his
deputy is Dr Dozie Ikedife.
In a statement signed by its spokespersons
Emma Nmezu and Dr. Clifford Chukwuemeka
Iroanya, IPOB said Debe Ojukwu was an
impostor and the the Ojukwu family of
Umudim-Nnewi, Biafraland, have since
dissociated themselves from him, Vanguard
reports.
The statement read in part: “Even though we
do not want to go into what makes Sylvester
Ude a.k.a. Debe Ojukwu to claim that he is a
Biafran agitator when he is a card-carrying
member of Nigeria’s APC party but we would
like to request Sylvester Ude a.k.a. Debe
Ojukwu to provide a single evidence to show
that we are violent.
“Is Sylvester Ude a.k.a. Debe Ojukwu aware that
utterances such as these can land him in jail
via a class-action lawsuit? Does this man, know
that we have been mowed down by agents of
the present government for simply gathering
and praying in a school football field ?”
According to the group, he (Debe Ojukwu)
had a disorganized brain and contradicted
himself when he said: “We own IPOB . IPOB
belongs to us. We formed IPOB. IPOB is not a
group. Our group has succeeded in being given
observer status at the UN and AU.”
IPOB queried who are the ‘we’ he was
referring to and which of his last two
sentences were correct; that IPOB is not a
group or that IPOB is our group?
“In addition, we challenge this Sylvester Ude to
provide any document that supports the claim
that IPOB have been given observer status at
the UN and AU. It is one thing to make a claim
but it is another thing to support or substantiate
such claim with documents or evidence ,” IPOB
added.
The issue of Biafra has been a resurgent
issue in the South east region of Nigeria and
the pro-Biafran activists have refused to give
up the fight for the actualization of Biafra.
There have been protests, demanding that
the Igbos be allowed to secede from Nigeria.
On Thursday, April 21, IPOB said its victory in
the struggle for a Biafra nation was close ,
despite spirited antics of its adversaries.
also known as Debe Ojukwu, who is said to
be the eldest son of late Chief Chukwuemeka
Odumegwu-Ojukwu
– Debe Ojukwu said Nnamdi Kanu was not
the leader of IPOB and he did not take the
advice of the elders so they cannot help
secure his release from prison
– Reacting to Debe’s statement, IPOB said
he was an impostor with a disorganized brain
The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has a
reacted to a statement credited to Chief
Sylvester Debe Ojukwu, who is said to be the
eldest son of late Chief Chukwuemeka
Odumegwu-Ojukwu, on Biafra struggle,
Nnamdi Kanu and IPOB leadership.
IPOB said Debe Ojukwu was an impostor
He added that Kanu was not the leader of
IPOB, but one Chief Justice Eze Ozobu, a
former chief judge of Enugu state and his
deputy is Dr Dozie Ikedife.
In a statement signed by its spokespersons
Emma Nmezu and Dr. Clifford Chukwuemeka
Iroanya, IPOB said Debe Ojukwu was an
impostor and the the Ojukwu family of
Umudim-Nnewi, Biafraland, have since
dissociated themselves from him, Vanguard
reports.
The statement read in part: “Even though we
do not want to go into what makes Sylvester
Ude a.k.a. Debe Ojukwu to claim that he is a
Biafran agitator when he is a card-carrying
member of Nigeria’s APC party but we would
like to request Sylvester Ude a.k.a. Debe
Ojukwu to provide a single evidence to show
that we are violent.
“Is Sylvester Ude a.k.a. Debe Ojukwu aware that
utterances such as these can land him in jail
via a class-action lawsuit? Does this man, know
that we have been mowed down by agents of
the present government for simply gathering
and praying in a school football field ?”
According to the group, he (Debe Ojukwu)
had a disorganized brain and contradicted
himself when he said: “We own IPOB . IPOB
belongs to us. We formed IPOB. IPOB is not a
group. Our group has succeeded in being given
observer status at the UN and AU.”
IPOB queried who are the ‘we’ he was
referring to and which of his last two
sentences were correct; that IPOB is not a
group or that IPOB is our group?
“In addition, we challenge this Sylvester Ude to
provide any document that supports the claim
that IPOB have been given observer status at
the UN and AU. It is one thing to make a claim
but it is another thing to support or substantiate
such claim with documents or evidence ,” IPOB
added.
The issue of Biafra has been a resurgent
issue in the South east region of Nigeria and
the pro-Biafran activists have refused to give
up the fight for the actualization of Biafra.
There have been protests, demanding that
the Igbos be allowed to secede from Nigeria.
On Thursday, April 21, IPOB said its victory in
the struggle for a Biafra nation was close ,
despite spirited antics of its adversaries.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment